What’s really at stake with Amendment 3

As Missourians prepare to vote on Amendment 3, it’s essential to understand what’s really at stake. This amendment is not just about abortion—it’s a sweeping agenda that would put parental rights in jeopardy and put the health and safety of women and underage girls at serious risk.

By Beau Heyman and Seth Dillon, with Missouri adaptations by Mary J. Browning

Amendment 3 would do three things: legalize unrestricted abortions up to the point of birth, jeopardize the requirement for parental consent when minors seek abortions, and remove essential safety regulations for abortion providers. This is not the kind of lawmaking that protects our most vulnerable citizens.

Parental Rights

The real issue one must consider with this amendment is the assault on parental rights. Today, Missouri law recognizes the critical role that parents should play in their children’s health decisions. If a minor seeks an abortion, her parents currently must provide consent—an appropriate safeguard to ensure that a life-altering decision like abortion is not being made in isolation or under duress. But Amendment would jeopardize this requirement. Imagine this: your 14-year-old daughter could be taken to an abortion clinic by someone you’ve never met, and you would have no legal power to intervene.

These concerns are not just theoretical but in fact a dangerous reality. By jeopardizing parental consent, we are in essence stripping families of their right to guide their daughters through one of the most difficult and consequential choices of their lives. Parental involvement isn’t just a formality; it’s a necessary protection for young girls who may be facing pressure from peers, a sexual partner, or even those who may be in trafficking situations. Amendment 3 ignores these realities and undermines the critical role of parents in protecting their children.

Health and Safety

An equally alarming point to consider are the potential consequences for the broader health and safety of all women and girls. Missouri law currently mandates that abortions be performed only by licensed physicians, ensuring a basic standard of medical care. The vague language contained in Amendment 3 which prohibits any “restriction” on abortion, would remove this common-sense requirement, allowing virtually anyone to perform abortions with no licensing, training, or oversight. This would open the door for potentially unqualified individuals to administer dangerous procedures, putting women’s and girls’ lives at risk.

Elimination of ultrasounds

Shockingly, Amendment 3 also eliminates the requirement for ultrasounds to be performed before abortions. Without an ultrasound, how can anyone accurately determine what stage their patient’s pregnancy is in, or even confirm if a woman is truly pregnant? The answer is chilling: under this amendment, women would be left to trust abortion providers, who have a financial incentive in performing the procedure. What this amendment is promoting is not healthcare—this is negligence, plain and simple.

Supporters of Amendment 3 argue that it’s about protecting women’s rights. But the truth is, this amendment will jeopardize women’s safety by removing the very safeguards that protect their health. Abortions performed by unlicensed individuals, without proper medical oversight or clarity on how far along a pregnancy may be, are reminiscent of the back-alley abortions of the past. We should be moving forward with women’s health protections, not going backwards.

Late-term abortion

And let’s not forget what this amendment would allow in practice: late-term abortions up to the moment of birth. Amendment 3 is not about addressing rare exceptions or difficult cases; it’s about removing all boundaries to abortion on demand. By allowing late-term abortion without restriction, we are opening the door to gruesome procedures, including dismemberment abortions, on fully viable unborn children.

If Amendment 3 passes, Missouri will transform from a state with balanced, reasonable laws to one of the most extreme pro-abortion states in the nation. We will be positioned to become a destination for unregulated, unsafe abortions, with little oversight and fewer protections for women and girls.

No matter where you stand on the issue of abortion, whether you’re pro-life, pro-choice, or somewhere in between, this amendment simply goes too far. It’s an assault on parental rights, an attack on the safety of underage girls, and a step toward dangerous, unregulated medical practices.

It’s time to protect our daughters, safeguard women’s health, and defend the rights of parents to be involved in the most critical decisions affecting their children. Missourians must recognize what is at risk and vote “No” on Amendment 3.

Beau Heyman is the Executive Director of First Care Women’s Clinic, one of the nation’s largest and most innovative pregnancy medical clinics. Beau is also the chairman and founder of Keep Florida Pro Life, a political committee focused on defeating Florida’s Amendment 4, learn more at www.keepfloridaprolife.org (http://www.keepfloridaprolife.org/)


Seth Dillon is the CEO of The Babylon Bee, a Christian satire platform that humorously tackles cultural and political issues. A strong advocate for free speech, Dillon promotes satire as a tool for challenging censorship and defending life, aiming to engage audiences in meaningful conversations on faith and truth. www.babylonbee.com (http://www.babylonbee.com/)
 
Mary J. Browning, Legal Advisor to Operation Outcry, has adapted the Florida article informing the Florida public of their ballot amendment to Amendment 3 in Missouri.  Mary is a strong advocate for encouraging those harmed by abortion to speak up so the public will be informed and, in this important hour, be able to converse and vote based on the truth. 
www.operationoutcry.org (http://www.operationoutcry.org/)