The Attorney General of the United States has authorized federal prosecutors across the country to “pursue substantial allegations” of voting irregularities, according to a leaked memo. The news comes as the Michigan legislature has issued its own subpoenas in an investigation of widespread ballot-counting and voter fraud.
AG William Barr stated in the 2-page memo: “I authorize you to pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities prior to the certification of elections in your jurisdictions in certain cases, as I have already done in specific instances. Such inquiries and reviews may be conducted if there are clear and apparently credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State.”
READ: Attorneys General of numerous states sue Pennsylvania over fraud
The memo was reportedly sent to U.S. attorneys, assistant attorneys general for the criminal division, civil rights division, national security division, and the director of the FBI.
“Any investigation of claims of irregularities that, if true, would clearly not impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State should normally be deferred until after the election certification process is completed. While U.S. Attorneys maintain their inherent authority to conduct inquiries and investigations as they deem appropriate, it will likely be prudent to commence any election-related matters as a preliminary inquiry so as to assess whether available evidence warrants further investigative steps,” it added.
The memo said that Department of Justice (DOJ) personnel should “exercise appropriate caution” and “maintain the Department’s absolute commitment to fairness, neutrality, and non-partisanship.”
“You are the most senior leaders in the United States Department of Justice and I trust you to exercise great care and judgment in addressing allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities,” Barr wrote. “While serious allegations should be handled with great care, specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims should not be a basis for initiating federal inquiries.”
Barr said at this time he is not suggesting any fraud altered the outcome of the election and thus the need for an investigation.
“Rather, I provide this authority and guidance to emphasize the need to timely and appropriately address allegations of voting irregularities so that all of the American people, regardless of their preferred candidate or party, can have full confidence in the results of our elections,” the memo said. “The American people and the leaders they freely elect deserve nothing less.”
On Sept. 2, amid Republican concerns of voter fraud due to the unprecedented distribution of mail-in ballots, Barr said during an appearance on CNN that he was aware of several “very big” voter fraud investigations in multiple states due to reported issues with mail-in ballots.
“This is playing with fire. We’re a very closely divided country here and people have to have confidence in the results of the election and the legitimacy of the government. And people trying to change the rules to this methodology—which as a matter of logic is very open to fraud and coercion—is reckless and dangerous,” he said at the time.
Now that voting has closed, Barr is encouraging department staff to pursue further investigations that were not possible before the election.
According to the DOJ’s policies described in the Criminal Division’s manual of Federal Prosecutions of Election Offenses (pdf), there are several legal and investigative considerations that staff must consider when investigating and prosecuting election offenses.
A number of media outlets declared Democratic nominee Joe Biden as president-elect on Nov. 7, after they projected victories for the former Vice President in the battleground states of Pennsylvania and Nevada, putting him over the 270 electoral vote threshold.
President Donald Trump has alleged voter fraud and said any declarations of victory are premature, with his campaign announcing legal challenges in several states.